Not only is recruiting people for interviews hard, due to the typically personal nature of the interview, planning where to meet them and when can be difficult. Participants can cancel or change the meeting place at the last minute. During the actual interview, a possible weakness is missing some information. This can arise from the immense multitasking that the interviewer must do.
Not only do they have to make the respondent feel very comfortable, they have to keep as much eye contact as possible, write down as much as they can, and think of follow up questions. After the interview, the process of coding begins and with this comes its own set of disadvantages.
First, coding can be extremely time consuming. This process typically requires multiple people, which can also become expensive. Some researchers report more missing data in interview research than survey research, therefore it can be difficult to compare populations .
Compared to something like a written survey, interviews allow for a significantly higher degree of intimacy,  with participants often revealing personal information to their interviewers in a real-time, face-to-face setting.
As such, this technique can evoke an array of significant feelings and experiences within those being interviewed. On the positive end, interviewing can provide participants with an outlet to express themselves. Since the job of interviewers is to learn, not to treat or counsel, they do not offer participants any advice, but nonetheless, telling an attentive listener about concerns and cares can be pleasing.
As qualitative researcher Robert S. On the negative end, the multiple-question based nature of interviews can lead participants to feel uncomfortable and intruded upon if an interviewer encroaches on territory that they feel is too personal or private. Furthermore, the comparatively intimate nature of interviews can make participants feel vulnerable to harm or exploitation.
In order to combat such feelings of vulnerability and inequity and to make participants feel safe, equal, and respected, researchers should provide them with information about the study, such as who is running it and what potential risks it might entail, and also with information about their rights, such as the right to review interview materials and withdraw from the process at any time.
It is especially important that researchers always emphasize the voluntary nature of participating in a study so that the participants remain aware of their agency. These aforementioned power dynamics present in interviews can also have specific effects on different social groups according to racial background, gender, age, and class. Race, for example, can pose issues in an interview setting if participants of a marginalized racial background are interviewed by white researchers,  in which case the existence of historical and societal prejudices can evoke a sense of skepticism and distrust.
Finally, another aspect of interviews that can affect how a participant feels is how the interviewer expresses his or her own feelings, for interviewers can project their moods and emotions onto those they are interviewing. For instance, if an interviewer feels noticeably uncomfortable, the participant may begin to share this discomfort,  and if an interviewer expresses anger, he or she is in danger of passing it on to the participant. So, researchers should try to remain calm, polite, and interested at all times.
Research on households pose specific ethical problems of anonymity and consent among interviewees, and there is an ongoing controversy over whether spouses should be interviewed in personal, individual interviews or in couple interviews. According to Hackman and Oldman several factors can bias an interviewer's judgment about a job applicant.
However these factors can be reduced or minimized by training interviews to recognized them. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
Interviewing has a variety of forms including: The asking and answering of questions can be mediated by the telephone or other electronic devices e. Interviews can be structured, semi-structure or unstructured. Consider reading about all the different types of interviews, since these distinctions are somewhat artifical, and there are important similarties and differences across these types.
Whether you are conducting a structured or unstructured interview, the development of the questions you ask takes into consideration:. All interview guides are developed iteratively - questions are developed, tested, and then refined based on what one learns from asking people these questions. When conducting semi-structured or unstructured interviews, the interviewer develops a 'loose' guide, with general questions designed to open up conversation about the topic.
Silence on the part of the interviewer is golden and can give the interviewee time to think and speak. A number of resources below provide excellent guidance on the development of research questions. The following resources were used and can be reviewed by those interested in more information of the topic of interviewing.
This includes knowing any terms particular to the program or the respondents' culture. Be careful asking "why" questions. This type of question infers a cause-effect relationship that may not truly exist.
These questions may also cause respondents to feel defensive, e. Conducting Interview Occasionally verify the tape recorder if used is working. Ask one question at a time. Attempt to remain as neutral as possible. That is, don't show strong emotional reactions to their responses. Patton suggests to act as if "you've heard it all before.
Be careful about the appearance when note taking. That is, if you jump to take a note, it may appear as if you're surprised or very pleased about an answer, which may influence answers to future questions. Provide transition between major topics , e. This can occur when respondents stray to another topic, take so long to answer a question that times begins to run out, or even begin asking questions to the interviewer.
Immediately After Interview Verify if the tape recorder, if used, worked throughout the interview. Make any notes on your written notes, e. Write down any observations made during the interview. For example, where did the interview occur and when, was the respondent particularly nervous at any time?
Were there any surprises during the interview? Did the tape recorder break? To round out your knowledge of this Library topic, you may want to review some related topics, available from the link below.
Each of the related topics includes free, online resources. Also, scan the Recommended Books listed below. They have been selected for their relevance and highly practical nature. Library's Blogs List of Blogs.
Add to Library Community Rules Submit your links.
Research Interviews. Interviews are completed by the interviewer based on what the respondent says. Interviews are a far more personal form of research than questionnaires. In the personal interview, the interviewer .
In-depth interviews can be defined as a qualitative research technique which involves “conducting intensive individual interviews with a small number.
Defined. Interviewing involves asking questions and getting answers from participants in a study. Interviewing has a variety of forms including: individual, face-to-face interviews and face-to-face group interviewing. Interview questions. A free inside look at Research interview questions and process details for 3, companies - all posted anonymously by interview candidates.
Interviews are among the most challenging and rewarding forms of measurement. They require a personal sensitivity and adaptability as well as the ability to stay within the bounds of the designed protocol. Before you go on a job interview, it's important to find out as much as you can about the company. Here's how to research a prospective employer.